Blog #2 (4/11/16)

Tim Barker discusses the digital and pre-digital sensibilities of glitch art in “Aesthetics of the Error: Media Art. the Machine, the Unforeseen, and the Errant.”

Barker claims the task of the glitch artist is to prompt their image processing software to art errantly and thus create an aesthetic effect that is both alogical as well as aesthetically unique. In doing so, the glitch artist relies on their computer to create their art, not necessarily their individual talent with a paintbrush or pencil like a traditional artist. This is not to say that the glitch artist is without talent though. Barker writes, “The emphasis of the creative act is now on process, and in particular opening up this process to outside forces” (45). Barker goes on to draw a parallel between glitch art and the works of Marcel Duchamp.

Duchamp Bicycle Wheel
Marcel Duchamp, Bicycle Wheel. 1951.

The comparison of Duchamp’s “readymade” art to glitch art is reasonable. Readymade art in its advent challenged the accepted role of the artist in creating a work of art. Duchamp claimed through his work that the artist’s intentionality could serve as his brushstroke, and his completed canvas need not necessarily be “beautiful.”

Following Barker’s lead in comparing the process of creating glitch art to that of the processes of art history movements, I suggest that glitch is more similar to abstract expressionism and the work of Jackson Pollock. Pollock once famously said, “The painting has a life of its own. I try to let it come through.” Therein lies the art of both abstract expressionism and glitch. The act of creating (in Pollock’s case, his physical splashing of paint onto enormous canvases) is the art and the final product of the painting is but a byproduct of the artistic process. I’d argue that glitch art too is more about the glitch- the error, the random, the mistake- and less about intentionality and thoughtful purpose.

jackson pollock at work
Jackson Pollock at work.
Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Blog #2 (4/11/16)

  1. I really enjoyed reading this. I like the comparison to the other art work and I, personally, think its extremely interesting how this art has spread in ways we weren’t already aware of. Jackson Pollock is an artist that I admire and I have seen his work prior to this class. It’s interesting to be able to make that connection now and look at it in a new way

    Like

  2. I thought the “I’d argue that glitch art too is more about the glitch- the error, the random, the mistake- and less about intentionally and thoughtful purpose” was interesting. Because Glitch I feel is somewhat of a…on the fence category. I think it’s different and new because it takes a different approach. But I wonder how much thought goes into an artwork if its just random, and it happens by luck. It makes me question of the person or machine can really call themselves artist and that this is a “cheat” in taking art that isn’t yours and making it your own.

    Like

  3. I also really liked the comparison on the artwork and the way you posted it on your blog very creative!!! I too am a big fan of Jackson Pollock and now can look at his work with a new light. GREAT POST

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s